St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Lewis

(after stating the facts

as above). We think the contention that the evidence did not warrant a finding that appellant was guilty of actionable negligence in any of the ways charged against it should be overruled.

The evidence as to whether those in charge of the train complied with the law (article 6371, R. S. 1925), requiring them to blow the whistle and ring the bell of the locomotive as it approached the crossing, was conflicting. That tending to show the law was ignored was sufficient to support the finding involved in the verdict, and that tending to show it was complied with would have…