Legal Opinion
DHL Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1981No. Nos. 79-7416, 80-7133 and 80-7200PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
After Pan American World Airways (Pan Am) and British Airways filed tariffs with the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) providing for a higher tariff rate for courier baggage, two courier companies (essentially freight forwarders or resellers of baggage space whose employees accompany bulk commercial documents shipped as air passenger baggage) filed complaints against *943the proposed tariffs. They alleged that the tariffs were unjustly discriminatory, excessive and anti-competitive. The CAB ultimately dismissed the complaints and the rates became effective. One of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Luverne L. Anderson and Josephine Rodriguez v. Allstate Insurance Company, a California Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dhl Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981