Legal Opinion

Bigman v. Lorio

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 11, 1914No. 19737PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Parish of Pointe Coupee; L. B. Claiborne, Judge. Action by Isaac Bigman against A. A. Lorio. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, C. J.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages, as for his alleged noncompliance with a contract whereby he agreed to buy plaintiff’s crop of sugar cane, and plaintiff has answered the appeal, praying for an increase in the amount of the award.

The contract was entered into on June 19, 1911, and reads, so far as it need be .here quoted, as follows, to wit:

“A. A. Lorio owns * * * a sugar cane factory. * * * Isaac Bigman grows * * * sugar cane. Lorio agrees to purchase from, and Bigman agrees ,to sell to, him sugar cane at the price of 82y2…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meraux v. Kenilworth Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J. P. Hudson & Sons Co. v. Godchaux Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API