Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Drosos

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1989No. 54993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matia, Judge.

Appellant, Pericles Drosos, appeals from the judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division.

The probate court determined that appellant is liable for Ohio estate taxes attributable to certain inter vivos gifts he acquired from his mother, Olga Drosos, in contemplation of her death. Appellee, Nick Drosos, is the husband and residuary beneficiary of the decedent.

This appeal is not well taken.

In his sole assignment of error, appellant contends:

“The trial court erred in its judgement \sic} that a recipient of a gift is liable for estate tax some eighteen…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of GatchOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In re Estate of FinkeOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. ESTATE OFCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Estate of Swallen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  3. Estate of Hans W. Vahlteich v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  4. Pnc Bank v. RoyOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. In Re Estate of ShererOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API