United States v. Timothy Stewart
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SYKES, Circuit Judge.
Timothy Stewart was convicted by a jury of armed bank robbery and use of a firearm during a crime of violence. He confessed to these crimes, but argues that his confession should not have been admitted at trial because the police used a two-step interrogation process in which Miranda warnings were initially withheld, in violation of Miranda as applied in the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Missouri v. Seibert, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004). He also claims the confession was involuntary in light of a promise of leniency made by the interrogating…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- United States v. Paul CieslowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Tashiri Wayne WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Jewett v. AndersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Shun Warren v. Michael BaenenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- People v. LopezIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.