Legal Opinion

United States v. Timothy Stewart

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 9, 2004No. 03-2377PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYKES, Circuit Judge.

Timothy Stewart was convicted by a jury of armed bank robbery and use of a firearm during a crime of violence. He confessed to these crimes, but argues that his confession should not have been admitted at trial because the police used a two-step interrogation process in which Miranda warnings were initially withheld, in violation of Miranda as applied in the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Missouri v. Seibert, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004). He also claims the confession was involuntary in light of a promise of leniency made by the interrogating…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul CieslowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Tashiri Wayne WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Jewett v. AndersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Shun Warren v. Michael BaenenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. People v. LopezIllinois Supreme Court · 2008

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API