Legal Opinion

In the Interest of A. T.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 15, 2000No. A00A2195PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

A delinquency petition charged A. T. with possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute.

A. T. and his guardian appeared at the detention hearing without counsel. At that hearing, the prosecutor announced the State’s intent to ask for a dispositional order providing for A. T.’s placement in restrictive custody, on grounds that the offense charged was a “designated felony act” under OCGA § 15-11-63 (a) (2) (B) (vii) by reason of A. T.’s three prior felony adjudications.

At the adjudication/disposition hearing, A. T. was represented by counsel. Defense counsel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. T. L. T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. In the Interest of C. T.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Queen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Mullinax v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In the Interest of L. J.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. In the Interest of E. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. In the Interest of R. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. In Re AtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. In Re LjCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API