Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Helton v. Sisters of Mercy of St. Joseph's Hospital

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 1961No. 5-2501Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEd. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice

The Majority Opinion has clearly and succintly stated the three points decided in this case; and I agree with the Majority on the first two of these points, but I dissent as to the third point.

I. The first point decided by the Majority is that the Hospital here sued is a public charity under the uncontradicted evidence in this case; and I agree with the Majority on this point. This issue cannot be determined by merely showing the statute under which the Hospital was organized, nor by showing what we held concerning this same Hospital in an earlier case. The fact question is: was the Hospital…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crossett Health Center v. CroswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Fordyce v. Woman's Christian National Library Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Trammell v. Town of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  4. Cabbiness v. City of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. Gregg v. HatcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API