Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hackett

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2011No. 2011-0308PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Paul L. Hackett III of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0040638, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1988. On October 11, 2010, relator, Cincinnati Bar Association, filed a complaint charging respondent with offering or participating in an employment agreement that restricts the right of a lawyer to practice after termination of the relationship and that provides for an illegal or clearly excessive fee.

{¶2} The parties submitted a consent-to-discipline agreement pursuant to Section 11 of the Rules and Regulations Governing Procedure on Complaints and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fox & Assocs. Co. v. PurdonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Reid, Johnson, Downes, Andrachik & Webster v. LansberryOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hackett v. Moore, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County2010

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carothers v. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, L.L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. AduseiOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In the Matter of: Karl N. TrumanIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Daniel v. BallitchOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Joel Franklin v. Emery Law Office, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API