Legal Opinion

Chapman & Dewey Land Co. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 7, 1909PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Mississippi Chancery Court; Edward D. Robertson, Chancellor; 1. Time was of the essence of the contract, and the attempted extensions thereof were void. Sandels & Hill’s Dig., §§ 1215, 1218, 1219; 54 Cal. 54; Id. 570; 80 Cal. 5; 69 Cal. 454; 68 Cal. 428; 89 Cal. 316; 80 Mo. App. 574; 86 Mo. App. 349; 169 Mo. 376; 152 Mo. 585; 70 Mo. App. 535; 68 Mo. App. 352; 77 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Mississippi Chancery Court; Edward D. Robertson, Chancellor; 1. Time was of the essence of the contract, and the attempted extensions thereof were void. Sandels & Hill’s Dig., §§ 1215, 1218, 1219; 54 Cal. 54; Id. 570; 80 Cal. 5; 69 Cal. 454; 68 Cal. 428; 89 Cal. 316; 80 Mo. App. 574; 86 Mo. App. 349; 169 Mo. 376; 152 Mo. 585; 70 Mo. App. 535; 68 Mo. App. 352; 77 Mo. App. 616; 1 Y. & C. Ex. 401, 416; Pomeroy on Contracts, § 382; 81 Ark. 80. 2. The county court acquired no jurisdiction to establish a drainage ditch with a terminus different from that described in the notice to…

1Opinion of the CourtFrauenthal, J.

The plaintiff, R. E. L. Wilson, instituted this suit against the defendant, the Chapman & Dewey Land Company, in the Mississippi Chancery Court, to recover the amounts of certain assessments made against the lands of the defendant for the construction of a public ditch or drain in a drainage district known as Tyronza Drainage Canal, and to enforce the lien thereon. The drainage district was established by the county court of Mississippi County under the provisions of sections 1203 to 1232 of Sandels & Hill’s Digest. The complaint alleged in detail each step taken in the formation and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Chicago, Santa Fé & California Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Brown v. Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Cribbs v. BenedictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Alexander v. Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Robinson v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Cobb v. National Lead Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1963
  5. Protho v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API