Legal Opinion

Sherwin-Williams Co. v. JB Collision Services, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 10, 2016No. CASE NO. 13cv1946-LAB (WVG)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON SHERWIN-WILLIAMS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR ALTERNATIVELY A REMITTITUR OF DAMAGES/NEW TRIAL. (DOCKET NO. 285)

Honorable Larry Alan Burns, United States District Judge

Sherwin-Williams has filed a post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law or alternatively a remittitur of damages/new trial. (Docket no. 285.)

I. Factual Background

This lawsuit arises out of a pair of automotive paint product supply agreements. Sherwin-Williams entered into the agreements with two auto body shops— JB Collision Services (the “JB Supply Agreement”) and JJT (the “JJT Supply Agreement”).…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Wei Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc., Delaware Corporation McMi Food Company, a Texas Corporation Harry Lees, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mooney v. Roller Bearing Company of America IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  2. Pistorio v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API