Sherwin-Williams Co. v. JB Collision Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON SHERWIN-WILLIAMS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR ALTERNATIVELY A REMITTITUR OF DAMAGES/NEW TRIAL. (DOCKET NO. 285)
Honorable Larry Alan Burns, United States District Judge
Sherwin-Williams has filed a post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law or alternatively a remittitur of damages/new trial. (Docket no. 285.)
I. Factual Background
This lawsuit arises out of a pair of automotive paint product supply agreements. Sherwin-Williams entered into the agreements with two auto body shops— JB Collision Services (the “JB Supply Agreement”) and JJT (the “JJT Supply Agreement”).…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Wei Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc., Delaware Corporation McMi Food Company, a Texas Corporation Harry Lees, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mooney v. Roller Bearing Company of America IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Pistorio v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022