Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Henderson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1977No. 1692PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain guilty verdicts on indictments charging rape, 1 statutory rape, 2 and criminal conspiracy. 3 We find the evidence sufficient and, therefore, sustain the lower court’s refusal to arrest judgment. Appellant also contends that the lower court should have given a tendered instruction that mere presence at the scene of the crime and knowledge of its commission are insufficient standing alone to support a finding of appellant’s complicity. 4 We agree and, therefore, grant a new trial.

At trial on February 18-25, 1976,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. United States v. Ralph Garguilo and Joseph MacChiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. StrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Commonwealth v. RoscioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SwerdlowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. State v. FortnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. PottsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API