Commonwealth v. Henderson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain guilty verdicts on indictments charging rape, 1 statutory rape, 2 and criminal conspiracy. 3 We find the evidence sufficient and, therefore, sustain the lower court’s refusal to arrest judgment. Appellant also contends that the lower court should have given a tendered instruction that mere presence at the scene of the crime and knowledge of its commission are insufficient standing alone to support a finding of appellant’s complicity. 4 We agree and, therefore, grant a new trial.
At trial on February 18-25, 1976,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. Ralph Garguilo and Joseph MacChiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Commonwealth v. StrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. RoscioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SwerdlowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- State v. FortnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. PottsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.