Chatham Plan, Inc. v. Clinton Trust Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
The plaintiff was incorporated to promote the “ Chatham Plan,” whereby a customer would make monthly deposits to be used partly to purchase insurance for him and partly for investment for his account. The defendant trust company has been held liable for breach of a contract whereby, as alleged in the complaint, it agreed “ to act as trustee in conjunction with the *499operation of said Chatham Plan and to receive and hold all moneys paid over under and pursuant to the said Chatham Plan.”
In my opinion the proof established quite conclusively that the defendant did not contract to act as trustee…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Watson v. . GuginoNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- McCreery v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Watson v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Derry v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Garlock v. Motz Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rogerson Aircraft Corp. v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1986
- Bogy v. BerlageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- W. K. Ewing Co. v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Crystal Gardens v. CenturyLink Communications, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- Rosenthal v. BecherCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936