Legal Opinion
United States v. Harlan Arnold and Dorene Arnold
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 18, 1989No. 88-1703PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILBURN, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants Harlan and Dor-ene Arnold (“debtors”) appeal the judgment of the district court reversing the decision of the bankruptcy court regarding the proper interest rate payable to the United States as a creditor through the Farmers Home Administration (“FmHA”). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
A
Debtors, who are farmers located in Me-costa County, Michigan, filed a voluntary joint petition for bankruptcy on February 2, 1987, under newly enacted Chapter 12 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. 1 See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1201-1231 (Supp.1989). On May 29,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Memphis Bank & Trust Company v. Linda Gail WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Matter of KainUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
- Gardner v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- In Rer TurnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
3Cited by73 opinions
- First Union Mortgage Corp. v. Eubanks (In Re Eubanks)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Alphonso Jones, Debtor, Robert M. Wood, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- In Re Aztec Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
- In Re HudsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
- American General Finance, Inc. v. Paschen (In Re Paschen)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.