Paul v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, Chief Judge.
In presenting his argument, plaintiff’s counsel conceded that the showing did not justify any consideration of the alleged ground for new trial based upon newly discovered evidence, and informed the Court that such purported ground was withdrawn.
Plaintiff urges that the Court erred in sustaining defendant’s objection to the questions asked the witnesses Lloyd Sunnarborg and Robert Risberg on rebuttal. The offer of proof pertained to the experiences with alleged defective and insecure hand brakes on cars of the defendant that these two former employees of the Zenith Dredge…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Warnie Lee Ivy, Cross-Appellants v. Security Barge Lines, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Patton v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. (Duquesne Slag Products Co., Third Party Defendant) (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Magna Trust Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
- Burch v. Reading CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.