Patton v. Vucinic
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
James, J.,
This is an action for unlawful arrest and false imprisonment. The learned trial judge after hearing the plaintiff’s evidence, in accordance with the practice of the Allegheny County Court, directed the jury to find a verdict in favor of the defendant. A motion for a new trial was made and duly refused. The ruling is based on the ground that the allegata of the plaintiff’s statement and the probata of the plaintiff’s evidence were at variance to such a degree that it failed to establish that false arrest and imprisonment were caused by the act of the defendant. We do not so…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McCarthy v. De ArmitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
- Kohler v. Pennsylvania R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- McAleer v. GoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Moyer v. Blue Mountain Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Lentz v. RaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cohen v. Lit BrothersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- COHEN v. Lit BrothersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Gibson v. Stainless Steel Sales Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Gibson v. Stainless Steel Sales Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Demby v. Drexel UniveristySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.