Legal Opinion
Martin v. State Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 15, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions
On rule to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
In an action upon a policy of fire insurance the plaintiff obtained a verdict, and the defendant was thereupon granted a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be had,.under which the reasons hereinafter considered are-relied on for setting aside the verdict.
1. That there was no legal proof in the cause to show a. waiver by the defendant of the limitation clause in the policy as to the time within which suit should be brought.
The clause referred to declared that no suit or action against the company for the recovery of any claim by…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Foot v. Ætna Life Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Killips v. Putnam Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Ames v. . N.Y. Union Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Andes Insurance v. FishIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Merchants Indem. Corp. v. EgglestonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- La Porte v. United States Radium CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1935
- Staehle v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INS. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Warren v. EMPLOYERS'FIRE INS. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Feder v. BANKERS NAT'L LIFE INS. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.