Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Ackerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The statute (Pers. Prop. Law, § 31) requires a writing only, if such agreement “ by its terms is not to be performed within one year from the making thereof.” The contract of employment sued upon is claimed to have been made on Saturday afternoon, November 14, 1925, for the period of one year. It is not the plaintiff’s proofs that the year was to begin on the following Monday when he commenced work. The contract was capable of performance within one year from the time it was made (Crown v. Litvak,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prokop v. Bedford Waist & Dress Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. Sheingold v. BaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Crown v. LitvakAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goon v. Fu Manchu's Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Fell v. American Financial & Development Corp. for IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API