Legal Opinion

Lundberg v. Kitsap County Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1914No. 11522PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kitsap county, French, J., entered March 8, 1913, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action for conversion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

The nature of this action can best be determined from a recital of the facts necessary for a proper understanding of the questions submitted by the appeal. On November 10, 1908, Julian Cordz was the owner of a small *76sawmill plant, near Colby, in Kitsap county, and on that day entered into a written agreement for its sale to appellant Lundberg and H. U. Johnson. Whether this was an absolute sale, as contended by appellant, or a conditional sale, as contended by respondent, is one of the disputed questions in the case. On February 16, 1910, the interest obtained by Lundberg and Johnson under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hammett v. . LinnemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Hamilton v. . HighlandsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beatty v. Western Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bank of California v. Clear Lake Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Low v. ColbyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Kuhn v. GrollWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Shipman v. KloppenburgIdaho Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API