Legal Opinion

Gardiner v. Lo Grande

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1983PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (83 AD2d 614) (see, e.g., Matter of Circus Disco v New York State Liq. Auth., 51 NY2d 24; see, also, Matter of Pleasant Val. Home Constr. v Van Wagner, 41 NY2d 1028).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MATTER OF PLEASANT VALLEY HOME CONSTR., LTD. v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Circus Disco Ltd. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gernatt Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Town of SardiniaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Triangle Inn, Inc. v. Lo GrandeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Hatcher v. Planning Board of NelsonvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Naftal Associates v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Rockland Properties Corp. v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API