Legal Opinion

Eagle Comtronics, Inc. v. Pico Products, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied in part, fourth affirmative defense and counterclaims reinstated, cross motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: This dispute arises out of a June 1988 patent license agreement entered into between plaintiff, Eagle Comtronics, Inc. (Eagle), as licensee, and defendant, Pico Products, Inc. (Pico), as licensor. On a prior appeal, we granted that part of Pico’s motion seeking dismissal of the causes of action for unjust enrichment and unfair competition (Eagle Comtronics v Pico Prods., 256 AD2d 1202), leaving only the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Eagle Comtronics, Inc. v. Pico Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Abrahami v. UPC Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Martinez v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  2. Widewaters Herkimer Co. v. AielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Luce-Metcalf v. DigatiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API