Wright v. American Mutual Liability Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Presiding Judge.
The board of workmen’s compensation found that claimant’s eye condition was not caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The denial of compensation was affirmed by the trial court and appeal followed. Held:
1. The testimony of an eye specialist in response toa hypothetical question, based on the findings and diagnosis testified to by another doctor, was admissible and not subject to the objections urged. Code § 38-1710. See Southern Bell Tel. &c. Co. v. Jordan, 87 Ga. 69 (3) (13 SE 202); Mayor &c. of Jackson v. Boone, 93 Ga. 662 (1)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mayor & Council v. BooneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Yates v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Zurich Insurance Co. v. ZerfassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Employers Insurance v. BrackettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mckenney's, Inc. v. SinyardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- McKenney's Inc. v. Kevin SinyardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Walker v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978