Legal Opinion

Hollywood v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2008No. S147954PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

Does a prosecutor’s consulting with the makers of a major motion picture that is based on a criminal defendant’s story create a conflict sufficient to require recusal of the prosecutor when the defendant is finally brought to trial? Here, the lead prosecutor, bent on tracking down the fugitive defendant in this capital case, gave his case files to a screenwriter/director to make a movie based on the defendant’s alleged life and crimes and consulted with the filmmakers during its subsequent production. The defendant, Jesse James Hollywood, was ultimately captured in Brazil…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. GamacheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Haraguchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. People v. McKinzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API