Legal Opinion

Martin v. Petroleum Tank Service

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1983No. 8310IC429Published

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

In their first assignment of error, defendants assert that the Full Commission erred in failing to find that plaintiffs claims are barred by G.S. § 97-58(a) and (c). Under G.S. § 97-58(c) “[t]he right to compensation for occupational disease shall be barred unless a claim be filed with the Industrial Commission within two years after death, disability, or disablement . . . .” Defendants contend that plaintiff did not file his claim within two years of his disablement and that the Industrial Commission therefore was without jurisdiction to hear his suit. See Poythress v. J. P.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Taylor v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Dowdy v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Duncan v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Poythress v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API