State ex rel. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Gum
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ULRICH, Judge.
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual) seeks this court’s writ of prohibition and/or mandamus compelling The Honorable Carl Gum to enter summary judgment in its favor in the underlying action. Liberty Mutual contends that the principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, and the law of the case required the trial court to deny Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend, and to grant Liberty Mutual’s Motions to Dismiss and Motions for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs claims for uninsured, under-insured, and medical payments coverages. Additionally, Liberty Mutual argues…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- King General Contractors, Inc. v. Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day SaintsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Douglas Toyota III, Inc. v. KeeterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Ganaway v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Frost v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. KinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gaunt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Gamble v. BrowningMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- State of Missouri, ex rel. K2W Precision, Inc., d/b/a Keizer Aluminum Wheels, Inc., Relator v. The Honorable Joseph A. Rathert, Judge of the Missouri Circuit Court, Twenty-Third Judicial Circuit (Jefferson County)Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022