Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark High Elk, United States of America v. Richard Laplante

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 3, 2006No. 04-3871, 04-3937PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

The Appellants, co-defendants Mark High Elk and Richard LaPlante, each were convicted by a jury of two felony counts of assault resulting in serious bodily injury and aiding and abetting the assault in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 113(a)(6) and 2, and two misdemeanor counts of simple assault and aiding and abetting the simple assault in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 113(a)(5) and 2. The Appellants appeal their respective convictions and sentences. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

By a four-count indictment, each Appellant was charged with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. BanksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. United States v. Nathan Deshawn FaustCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. United States v. Robert Mercado, Jr., United States of America v. Daniel Bravo, Aka's Sporty Seal GCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Two ElkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API