Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Transportation v. Cedars Group, LLC
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 26, 2013No. 109,943PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS is VACATED; THE TRIAL COURTS ORDER IS REVERSED. I
EDMONDSON, J.
¶ 1 We must determine whether the three-day mailing rule of 12 0.8.2006(D) applies to defendants'/appellants' post-trial motions for costs and attorney fees filed in the trial court.1 We answer in the affirmative. A jury verdict was rendered in favor of the defendants in a condemnation action on February 17, 2011. The award was at least ten percent greater than the award of the commissioners, so attorney fees and costs were recoverable pursuant to 27 O.S8. 11 and 66 0.8. 55(D). Counsel for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCullough v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Tidemark Exploration, Inc. v. GoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Whitehall Homeowners, Ass'n v. Appletree Enterprise, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- L'GGRKE v. ShermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
3Cited by10 opinions
- IN RE AMENDMENT TO 12 O.S. CH. 15 APP. 1 RULES OF OKLAHOMA SUPREME C0URTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- IN RE AMENDMENT TO 12 O.S. CH. 15 APP. 1 RULES OF OKLAHOMA SUPREME C0URTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- IN RE AMENDMENT TO 12 O.S. CH. 15 APP. 1 RULES OF OKLAHOMA SUPREME C0URTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- IN RE AMENDMENT TO 12 O.S. CH. 15 APP. 1 RULES OF OKLAHOMA SUPREME C0URTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- IN RE AMENDMENT TO 12 O.S. CH. 15 APP. 1 RULES OF OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.