Legal Opinion

Rowley v. Shepardson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 13, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal in Chancery. Heard in vacation following the September Term, 1915, Windham County, on bill, answer, replication and evidence taken, Fish, Chancellor. Decree, on facts found by the chancellor, that the defendant Eva C. Shepardson, pay to the orators the sum of $810 with interest and costs. The orators appealed. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

This is a bill in equity in which the plaintiffs seek satisfaction of a judgment at law obtained by them against Geo. W. Shepardson in an action on the case for deceit. The deceit was in the sale to the plaintiffs by George W. Shepardson of a farm known as the Hunting Farm, title to which was in Eva C. Shepardson, wife of George W. For the history of the case at law and the principles therein laid down, see 83 Vt. 167, 74 Atl. 1002, 138 Am. St. Rep. 1078, and 85 Vt. 226, 81 Atl. 917.

This case has twice before been here; once on demurrer to the bill (87 Vt. 57, 87 Atl. 528) and again on facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rowley v. ShepardsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  2. Lang v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  3. Rowley v. ShepardsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  4. Rowley v. ShepardsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
  5. Rowley v. ShepardsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City National Bank v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API