Legal Opinion

Pence v. Lemp

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from District Court, Ada County. No brief filed. No brief filed.

1Opinion of the CourtHuston, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal. The-grounds upon which the motion is based are numerous, and, we think, in every instance well taken. In fact, there seems to-have been, either through negligence or misapprehension, a complete abnegation, in the taking of this appeal, not only of the-rules of this court, but of the provisions of the statutes. It appears from the record that there was never any engrossment of' the statement, or settlement thereof. There appears in the record the following: “The fore-going statement on motion for a new1 trial is hereby settled and allowed, and ordered…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shurtliff v. Extension Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Doust v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hattabaugh v. VollmerIdaho Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Parmentier v. CassiesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API