Legal Opinion

State v. Stirens

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 1, 1993No. C5-92-1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDEBRING, Justice.

This case involves a constitutional challenge to an upward durational departure as the result of an application of the patterned sex offender statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.1352 (1990). Appellant was convicted of one count of second degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.343, subd. 1(a) (1990). Although the presumptive sentence for an offender with appellant’s criminal history score was 21 months stayed with probation, the sentencing court dispositionally 1 and durationally departed by imposing a sentence of 180 months. Under the sentence, after…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. LorentzenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. State v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Denem Anthony NullSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. State v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. State v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API