State v. Stirens
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
GARDEBRING, Justice.
This case involves a constitutional challenge to an upward durational departure as the result of an application of the patterned sex offender statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.1352 (1990). Appellant was convicted of one count of second degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.343, subd. 1(a) (1990). Although the presumptive sentence for an offender with appellant’s criminal history score was 21 months stayed with probation, the sentencing court dispositionally 1 and durationally departed by imposing a sentence of 180 months. Under the sentence, after…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. LorentzenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Denem Anthony NullSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.