Legal Opinion

Kelly v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 9, 1992No. 91-2075PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

Appellant, a juvenile offender who was convicted and sentenced as an adult for the offenses of burglary of an occupied structure, burglary of a conveyance, and grand theft, appeals his convictions and the imposition of adult sanctions. We affirm appellant’s convictions, however, we vacate appellant’s sentences and remand the case for resentencing after entry of adequate written findings supporting the imposition of adult sanctions.

In an attempt to comply with the requirements of section 39.111(7)(c),1 Florida Statutes (1989), the trial court entered an order determining that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RhodenSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Posey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Tighe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCoy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Hangen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API