Legal Opinion

Boyd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 2000No. 98-03316PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Chief Judge.

Terrance Boyd appeals from certain probation conditions imposed upon him following the entry of his guilty plea. He correctly argues that the trial court erred in imposing the portions of condition 18 which prohibit the use or possession of alcohol, or associating with persons who consume alcohol, or frequenting places where alcohol is the main source of business. Those prohibitions are unrelated to the offense of solicitation or delivery of cocaine. See Gerstenberger v. State, 667 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Richardson v. State, 620 So.2d 257 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Boyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Gerstenberger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API