Legal Opinion
Hanover Insurance v. Borough of Atlantic Highlands
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 25, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILROY, J.S.C.
The sole issue to be decided by the Court is whether an insurance carrier’s claim for reimbursement of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits paid to its insured under N.J.SA. 39:6A-9.1, from a public entity, is barred by N.J.SA. 59:9~2e. The Court answers the question in the affirmative.
The matter was presented to the Court by the parties filing cross-motions for summary judgment. Both counsel concurred that the issue presented is a matter of law and submitted the same to the Court upon an agreed state of facts as set forth in the moving and opposing papers.
Plaintiff Hanover…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brewer v. PorchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Aetna Ins. Co. v. Gilchrist Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Polyard v. TerryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. JosephsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Polyard v. TerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liberty International Underwriters Canada v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Feigenbaum v. GuaraciniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- County of Bergen v. HORIZON BLUENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Hanover Insurance v. Borough of Atlantic HighlandsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- State ex rel. N.L.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.