Legal Opinion

The Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1940No. L. A. 16928; L. A. 16929PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

These two proceedings were on the December, 1938, calendar of this court, sitting in bank, with five regular justices and one justice pro tempore present. The cases were then argued by counsel for the respective parties and by one of the amici curiae. Thereafter and before any decision of either of said causes had been agreed upon, one of said justices died, and another of said justices declared his disqualification to participate in any decision that might be *102rendered in either of said causgs. In this situation, this court found that it was unable to procure the concurrence of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. In re ShortridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. In Re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Chula v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. LaGRANGE ETC. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API