Weitman v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.), entered on or about February 18, 1994, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant City of New York’s cross motion to be relieved as counsel for defendant-appellant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The question of whether an employee of the City of New York is entitled to representation under General Municipal Law § 50-k depends on whether the employee was acting within the scope of his or her public employment and is to be decided in the first instance by the Corporation Counsel, whose determination "may be set aside…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Williams v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Stavitz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sanchez v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- DeRespiris v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Sanderson-Burgess v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025