Legal Opinion

Schoeffel v. Craig

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 10, 1932No. 19978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.

Plaintiff instituted suit seeking judgment on a note and the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage giVen to secure the payment of said note. The parties will be referred to as they appear in the trial court. Defendants answered by general denial and also pleaded certain special defenses, to wit, that defendants had paid to the COnsearvative Loan Company, as agent of plaintiff, the sum of $849 to apply on the principal indebtedness. Defendants denied that there was any attorney fee due plaintiff, and tendered $699.60 in payment of the amount due from defendants to plaintiff, to which answer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Catlin v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Swearingen v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Lind v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Illinois Valley Trust Co. v. SherleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Kansas Educational Ass'n of Methodist Episcopal Church v. McMahanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API