Legal Opinion

Leerburger v. Watson

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for specific performance.

1Opinion of the Court

Gerard, -T.

Both plaintiff and defendant ask for the specific performance of a contract for the purchase and sale of ISTos. 50 and 52 Franklin street, in this city. Plaintiff, the vendee, alleges that there are certain alleged deficiencies in or objections to the title of the property tendered him, as follows: That a retaining wall in the rear encroaches upon the premises; that cornices, - sills-, lintels, ledge, and casings of the buildings in question project over the public street; that platforms, ■ iron steps, trap door • and freight elevator encroach upon the sidewalk, and that the vaults…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. . TrueNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Huttemeier v. . AlbroNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Jorgensen v. . SquiresNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. City of New York v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Wormser v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Roberts v. LarsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. Sheridan v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Ancel Realty Corp. v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API