Legal Opinion

Eutzy v. Florida

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 15, 1985No. 84-6182PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.

Justice Marshall, with whom Justice Brennan joins,

dissenting.

Although the State of Florida has adopted a system of capital sentencing that allows a trial judge to overturn a sentencing jury’s finding as to the inappropriateness of death — and although this Court has upheld that system as constitutional, see Spaziano v. Florida, 468 U. S. 447 (1984) — that system nevertheless remains subject to the dictates of Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U. S. 586 (1978), and Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U. S. 104 (1982). In Florida, as in other States, a capital defendant has a right to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lambrix v. SingletarySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Swafford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Raleigh Porter v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Lucas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  5. Brookings v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API