State v. Hankins

David Lee Hankins (“Defendant”) appeals one of his three convictions for first-degree child molestation following a bench trial. See § 566.067.1.1 In one point on appeal, Defendant argues there was. insufficient evidence that he touched the genitals of one of his victims, A;W. For the reasons that follow, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Factual and Procedural Background

On appeal, “[t]his Court views the evidence and all reasonable inferences derived therefrom in a light most favorable to .the verdict and disregards any contrary evidence and inferences.” State v. Lopez-McCurdy, 266…