Legal Opinion

State v. Huckabee

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 7, 2004No. COA03-938Published

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Defendant, Edward Demorris Huckabee, contends the trial court should have granted his motions to suppress evidence and to dismiss for want of sufficient evidence. He also contends a new trial is warranted because the trial court rendered an erroneous jury instruction. After careful review we affirm Defendant's convictions.

On 22 May 2002, members of the City-County Vice and Narcotics team of New Hanover County were surveilling an apartment after receiving information from a confidential informant that illegal drugs and weapons could be located at that address. Specifically,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DiazSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. SquiresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. PrevetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. FordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API