Hall v. State

HOTTEN, J.,

dissenting, in which GREENE and WATTS, JJ., join.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. I would hold that the evidence at trial, when viewed in a light most favorable to the State, was sufficient to satisfy § 3-602.1 of the Criminal Law Article (“Crim. Law”), which was not unconstitutionally vague as applied to Ms. Hall (“Petitioner”).

I. The Evidence at Trial was Sufficient to Sustain Petitioner’s Conviction.

Crim. Law § 3-602.1 required that Petitioner’s conduct “created a ‘substantial risk of harm’ to A.’s physical health and that her conduct was such that a reasonable…