Legal Opinion
State v. Bayer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 1, 2009No. 060342557; A134518PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of a controlled substance (DUII-CS), ORS 813.010. 1 On appeal, he assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress an incriminating statement made in what he contends were compelling circumstances before he received Miranda warnings. He also challenges the court’s failure to dismiss the charges against him for lack of a speedy trial. And he assigns error to the court’s decision to admit expert testimony by a drug recognition expert (DRE) regarding his administration of the so-called DRE protocol, on the ground that the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennsylvania v. BruderSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. CasillasNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. ChelemedosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. LINH THAT CAM TONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. CoulsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.