Legal Opinion

Milnor v. Metz

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1842PublishedCited by 31 opinions

ON appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States, for the county of Washington in the district of Columbia. The appellants, Milnor and Thompson, were, during the years 1836 and 1837, United States guagers for the port of Philadelphia, and as such received the full compensation allowed by law for that period.' The duties having been rendered unusually laborious during the year, by the • operation of the act of July 4th, 1836, reducing the duties on wines, under which…

Read the full summary

ON appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States, for the county of Washington in the district of Columbia. The appellants, Milnor and Thompson, were, during the years 1836 and 1837, United States guagers for the port of Philadelphia, and as such received the full compensation allowed by law for that period.' The duties having been rendered unusually laborious during the year, by the • operation of the act of July 4th, 1836, reducing the duties on wines, under which they were required to reguage them; they appealed to Congress for extra compensation, to the amount- of their full ordinary…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Caíron

delivered the opinion of. the Court.

■ ■ The question in this cause is, whether a claim on the United States passed by an assignment made by Milnor, an insolvent, by force of an act of Pennsylvania, where the insolvent resided, and where the assignment took place.

The application was..made to the Court of Common Pleas, of Philadelphia county, 24th December, 1838. According to the requirements of the insolvent act, there was presented: “A statement of all the estate, effects, and property of the petitioner, wheresoever situate, and of whatsoever kind.” He says, “Your petitioner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MacDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Heirs of Emerson v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1839

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Phelps v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Ricky Wayne Bracewell v. Walter W. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Williams v. HeardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Burgess v. SikesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. Lewis' Adm'r v. GlennSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API