Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Rapidigm, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 28, 2008No. 07-2274UnpublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

Jacqueline Martinez appeals the District Court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Rapidigm, Inc. (“Rapidigm”) on all three of her claims. Her claims included: (1) gender discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2 et seq. (“Title VII”) and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. §§ 951 et seq. (“PHRA”); (2) retaliation for protected conduct under Title VII and the PHRA; and (3) wrongful discharge under state law. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm the order of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bumbarger v. New Enterprise Stone & Lime Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Byas v. Legislature of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2009
  3. Adela Mendoza v. Dietz & Watson, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  4. BENNETT v. SEPTADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Baylets-Holsinger v. The Pennsylvania State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API