Eisenberg v. Reininger
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
EDNA D. M. Reininger, defendant in error, was appointed administratrix of the estate of her husband, Morris Reininger, a druggist, who died May 30, 1930. By order of the Denver county court, she continued to operate deceased's drug store business at 1894 South Pearl, the premises being rented from plaintiff in error. Mary Eisenberg, at a rental of $65 per month. Of the total amount, $715, so due for rent, the administratrix paid $371.50, leaving a balance of $343.50 which amount was allowed by the county court as an expense of administration and a statutory claim of the second class.
Upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Deeble v. AlertonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Grover v. CloverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
- Remington v. RemingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Hale v. BurfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Elam v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Wigington v. WigingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944