Asbury Park & Ocean Grove Bank v. Dam
United States District Court
1Opinion of the Court
Proctor, D. C. J.
This is a return of a rule to show cause why the defendant, Andrew C. Dam, should not be required to pay out of his income such weekly sum in installments on account of a judgment recovered against him, pursuant to section 201-J of the District Court act, which empowers the court to require the defendant to make payments out of his income on account of an execution.
It appears that the defendant is a retired naval officer of the United States government, and receives a pension of $165 per month. Counsel for the defendant stated at the argument that the defendant, although…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Passaic National Bank, C., Co. v. EelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Oetjen v. HintemannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- Petersen v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- Davis v. BuchananSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- Freedom Finance Co., Inc. v. FleckensteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971