Legal Opinion
Piel Const. Co. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ex rel. Hendricks
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 25, 1929No. 3984PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
The Piel Construction Company entered into a contract with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for the construction of a concrete highway, giving the Commonwealth its bond with the Maryland Casualty Company as surety to assure, among other things, payment for all material and labor entering into the work pursuant to Pennsylvania Acts in that regard (Act May 31, 1911, P. L. 468; Act May 16,1921, P. L. 650 [Pa. St. Supp. 1928, § 19207]). Later, Charles G. Hendricks, trading as George R. Hendricks & Son, by contract with the Piel Company, engaged to supply the cement.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Philadelphia v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Philadelphia v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- American Bonding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- N. Holmes & Sons v. Briggs & DrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Philadelphia v. Neill & Lincoln Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Auto Insurance Co. v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Alvah C. Luce, D/B/A Northern Electric Service & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- United States v. GrubbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. GrubbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- Golden West Construction Co. v. United States ex rel. BernadotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Golden West Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.