Legal Opinion

United States v. Christopher Hum

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 10, 2014No. 13-2985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Christopher Hum appeals the revocation of his supervised release and resulting 60-month commitment to the Bureau of Prisons as substantively unreasonable. Hav ing jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742, we affirm. 1

On August 15, 2006, Hum pled guilty to conspiracy to manufacture 500 grams or more of methamphetamine under 21 U.S.C. § 846. On December 8, 2006, Hum was sentenced to four years of imprisonment followed by five years of supervised release. On January 8, 2010, Hum began his term of supervised release. On September 7, 2012, Hum’s probation officer filed a petition requesting the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Duane LarisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Johnny Franklin, Jr., Also Known as Jack CulpepperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. KreitingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. MerrivalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Joshua RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Larry Dean RederickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Ronald BorchertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  4. Wilson v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API