Hoyt's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 40, Jan. T., 1912, by Wm. T. S. Hoyt, et al., from judgment of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1911, No. 214, affirming decree of O. C. Clearfield Co., No. 3250, sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report in Estate of Milo Hoyt. Appeal from judgment of tbe Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 40, Jan. T., 1912, by Wm. T. S. Hoyt, et al., from judgment of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1911, No. 214, affirming decree of O. C. Clearfield Co., No. 3250, sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report in Estate of Milo Hoyt. Appeal from judgment of tbe Superior Court. In tbe Orphans’ Court A. O. Smith, P. J., filed the following opinion: The first exception is to the action of the auditor in surcharging accountants with $1,111.71 for which credit was claimed in the account filed as expenditures by Sarah Hoyt, deceased, executrix aud life tenant, for permanent improvements and…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
On both questions involved in this appeal, we concur in the conclusion reached by the Superior Court.
The decree is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Rettew's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Shaw's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- United States v. SchofieldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Powell v. CocowitchSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Farber's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.