Legal Opinion

Huddleston v. City of Murfreesboro

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1982PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

The plaintiff, Huddleston, was employed by the defendant City of Murfreesboro as a fireman on September 1, 1977, in a probationary status but, at the time he was discharged from that position by the City Manager approximately one year later, he had achieved permanent employee status. In September, 1978, the plaintiff was accused by his superiors of being in violation of a regulation of the Firefighters Duty Manual which provided in pertinent part:

“Immoderate hair styles including those which will interfere with the proper wearing of the uniform hat are prohibited.”

This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lansden v. TuckerTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Case v. CarneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. City of Memphis v. Civil Service CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Davis v. Shelby County Sheriff's DepartmentTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Tidwell v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Gifford v. City of GatlinburgCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. Larry M. Duncan v. The City of Oneida, Tennessee, and Mack BurchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API