Wright Co. v. Paulhan
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by the Wright Company against Louis Paulhan. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, District Judge.
There is very little that I should wish to add to Judge Hazel’s opinion in the case of Wright Co. v. HerringCurtiss Co., 177 Fed. 257, were it not for the ardor of the defendant’s counsel and their insistence that a different showing has been made here. In view of the seriousness of the contest, I feel obliged to give my own reasons for this decision.
The defendant says that he does not infringe the patent because he does not use a device which automatically always presents to the wind that side of the rudder nearer the angle of lesser incidence; and that if the patent be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- Wright Co. v. Herring-Curtiss Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wright Co. v. Herring-Curtiss Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Esnault-Pelterie v. Chance Vought Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Montgomery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
- Armstrong v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
- Meyers v. SkinnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1910